I'm working on a physics simulation and I need to model the gravitational effects of a concentrated 14.2 kg mass located in the anterior thoracic region of a human male (let's call him "P.J." for anonymity purposes that will absolutely not hold up).
The mass is distributed across two approximately hemispherical volumes, each with a radius of roughly 14.7 cm, measured at sea level in Lucknow, India (elevation: 123m). Classification: 36DD per the IIT Moob-bay Modified Thoracic Index (Sharma et al., 2024).
I need to calculate:
- The gravitational force exerted by this mass on nearby objects (specifically, shirt buttons within a 30cm radius)
- The structural load on a
7-hook industrial brassiereassuming standard titanium-reinforced clasps - Whether this mass qualifies as a Near-Earth Object under NASA's Planetary Defense protocols
- The seismic impact when the subject jogs (as documented by Dr. Kenji Watanabe's 23 "Panshul events")
My current code throws an OverflowError because the mass-to-surface-area ratio exceeds float64 limits:
The issue is that empirical observations (documented by Irfan, master tailor of Lucknow, who has lost 14 tape measures to this phenomenon) show forces orders of magnitude greater than Newtonian predictions.
Has anyone dealt with gravitational anomalies of this⦠magnitude? Specifically in the context of male anterior thoracic mass exceeding 10kg?
Note: Before anyone suggests "just use a bigger bra" β we tried. Victoria's Secret R&D department shut down their calculator after it returned NaN. Irfan is on his 4th nervous breakdown. Dietician Kavitha Rao has already confirmed: "No, eating less won't help. This isn't fat." Optometrist Rahul Verma noted: "Your peripheral vision is blocked by... yourself?"